These woodlands generally occur on thin acidic soils in the wetter parts of the north and west of Britain. They are particularly important for moss and lichen assemblages – and are some times described as the UK’s temperate rain forest. They also have an important bird assemblage
Choose which trees to plant and in what relative proportions based on:
- The woodland types that would regenerate naturally on a site, based on local conditions such as soil pH, nutrient levels, hydrology, and climate.
- The appropriate frequencies of species in a given community.
- Availability of appropriate management both during establishment and subsequently, which would aid community development.
The Forestry Commission can advise on these factors locally (see contact pages for more details).
Large, new woods should include areas of open ground as this aids structural diversity and encourages high biodiversity.
Size and proximity to other woodlands are important:
- Larger woodlands (ideally > 5 ha) support and retain more woodland wildlife.
- Small woodland blocks can be enhanced by scrub established around the perimeters to reduce wind penetration to the interior.
Adding to existing woods or creating new blocks close by will increase the potential for species colonisation. Edges should be designed to avoid a hard edge between woodland and open ground, and managed to maintain it.
Woodland creation is not appropriate where there are existing habitats of value, or where there is potential to restore to higher priority habitats (eg rarer or more threatened), or where it will create barriers for wildlife movement between existing habitats.
Establishment techniques
Several methods can be used. When deciding on which to use, assess available resources, the local landscape and the site objectives.
Natural colonisation
Natural colonisation will suit sites adjacent to existing upland oak woodland. Preparation of a rough seedbed will often enhance germination and take of new trees. Compaction and waterlogging can severely affect tree growth. These factors can be improved, for example by subsoiling.
Pioneer species, such as birch can develop a dense scrub cover relatively quickly (over 10 years). Thereafter natural succession will see the balance gradually change as new species colonise. This can take a very long time, but as this is a natural process, the value for wildlife will remain.
Benefits of natural colonisation are:
- Low cost – although rabbit fencing and deer control may be needed.
- Natural composition – of species adapted to the conditions found on the site.
- Natural distribution of trees – natural look to the landscape as opposed to planting in rows.
- Promotes conservation of local biodiversity.
Disadvantages:
- Slow to develop full assemblage of species (but valuable in the meantime)
- Can look untidy during establishment
Tree and shrub planting
This would be appropriate where natural colonisation is unlikely, eg far from existing woodland, or where establishment is required especially quickly.
Whatever the planting method used it is important to ensure that:
Trees and shrubs are planted in loose friable soil to ensure adequate water storage.
Rootstock is always protected from desiccation.
Competing rank grass and other plants are managed for 4-5 years (see below).
When preparing the soils, redress any compaction where necessary by ripping.
Do not improve soil fertility - if soil fertility is extremely low then consider other habitats such as heathland or use natural colonisation over a long time period. Most woodland soils are infertile, especially in phosphorus. Tree establishment depends on root penetration and low competition. Poorer soils help to reduce competition from grasses and herbaceous vegetation, and develop a diverse ground flora.
Planting patterns and spacing
The planting scheme used at the outset will be a major influence on resulting woodland structure.
- Plant naturalistically, not in straight lines - this leads to wind tunnelling and a simplified structure of limited value for wildlife.
- Sparse planting leads to the development of more natural woodlands than the dense planting traditional in commercial silviculture.Wider spacing involves fewer trees, lower planting and lower maintenance costs. It produces bushy trees and a slower closing canopy, as well as reducing weeding during establishment, and delaying thinning for several decades.
» at an average spacing of 3.6 m, 722 trees are required per ha.Closer spacing, results in taller trees, earlier canopy closure and requires earlier thinning, otherwise a simple structure develops lacking many of the features needed by birds and other wildlife. Closer spacing than 2m should not be considered.
» at an average spacing of 2 m, 2,500 trees are required per ha.
Planting mixes should include shrubs appropriate to the conditions. Upland oak woodland shrubs include hazel, rowan, with some holly, bramble and hawthorn. Planting design will include shrubs planted randomly, some in tight clusters forming thickets, others more widely spaced, in single and mixed species clusters, depending on soils and topography.
Birch occurs in upland oak woods and can be used as a nurse for other species. This helps soil formation and adds shelter and warmth, without casting heavy shade.
Where nursery-grown trees are used, whips (small, bare-rooted stock) generally out-perform standards. They are usually more cost effective as prices range from £0.50 to £1.00 per unit, depending on species.
Planting should be undertaken during the dormancy period – November to February – avoiding frosty weather. Roots must not dry out. Heel unplanted stock in until it can be planted out. One person can plant 800-1,500 whips a day by hand.
Where they occur, protection from deer and rabbits is essential. Tree shelters are costly but increase survival rates, aid early growth and reduce the need for weed control. Fencing costs are high: ca £5 m-1 for rabbit fencing, ca £10 m-1 for deer fencing, but reusable types are available. Any fencing in black grouse areas will need to be appropriately marked with high visibility markers to prevent collisions. Remove tree guards and fencing once the crop is well established (5+ years).
New plantings will need weed control for the first 4-5 years to limit competition. This need not be rigorous, as occasional losses will create useful gaps. Options include: biodegradable mats fitted around base of tree; wood chip or bark mulch application; glyphosate application once or twice a year; mowing or tillage. Mulching is effective but large supplies would be needed for large schemes. This and matting help to retain soil moisture
Ground flora establishment
A woodland ground flora will colonise very slowly. Introduction is only required where colonising is unlikely.
Woodland topsoil will include seeds and root material as well as fungal spores and mycelia, and can therefore be an effective means of introducing ground flora. Where available, this can be applied in clumps from which vegetation will spread over time. Permission will be required from Natural England where the donor site is an SSSI.
Alternatively, seeds can be collected and sown. Otherwise, once trees and shrubs have developed, a surrogate woodland flora will develop as taller grasses and plants are suppressed by shade. This will continue to develop.
Long-term management of woodland
Long-term management can involve various measures at various stages, including:
- Removal of nurse species.
- Thinning and coppicing of pioneer species to develop a complex structure.
- Filling in gaps where plantings have failed. However, consider the value of keeping gaps open.
- Maintaining rides to retain open ground and edge for wildlife such as butterflies.
- Retaining both standing and fallen deadwood where it occurs. This is important for a range of invertebrates and hole nesting birds (e.g. woodpeckers).
- Management of deer and grazing. Deer numbers must be kept low to ensure regeneration and structure are maintained. Low intensity grazing can be beneficial particularly to ground flora.
Further reading
Buckley, G P and Knight, D J (1989) The feasibility of woodland reconstruction. In G P Buckley (ed) Biological Habitat Reconstruction, pp 171-88. Bellhaven Press
Francis, J L, Morton, A J and Boorman, L A (1992) The establishment of ground flora species in recently planted woodland. Aspects of Applied Biology 29: 171-78.
Gough, M W and Marrs R H (1990) A comparison of soil fertility between semi-natural and agricultural plant communities: Implications for the creation of species-rich grassland on abandoned agricultural land. Biological Conservation 51, pp83-96
Hodge, S J (1995) Creating and managing woodlands around towns. Forestry Commission Handbook 11. HMSO, London.
Holmes, N T H (1998) Floodplain restoration. In R G Bailey, P V José and B R Sherwood (eds) UK floodplains, pp 331-348. Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, Otley.
Hopkins, J J (1996) Scrub ecology and conservation. British Wildlife 8(1): 28-36.
Moffat, A and McNeill, J (1994) Reclaiming disturbed land for forestry. Forestry Commission Bulletin 110. HMSO, London.
Parker, D M (1995) Habitat creation, a critical guide. English Nature Science No 21.
Peterken, G F (1993) Woodland conservation and management. Second Edition. Chapman and Hall, London.
Peterken, G F and Hughes, F M R (1998) Limitations and opportunities for restoring floodplain forest in Britain. In R G Bailey, P V José and B R Sherwood (eds) UK floodplains, pp 423-436. Westbury Academic and Scientific Publishing, Otley.
Rodwell, J S and Patterson, G S (1994) Creating new native woodland. Forestry Commission Bulletin 112. HMSO, London.
RSPB, NRA and RSNC (1994) The new rivers and wildlife handbook. The RSPB, Sandy.
Relevant case study
We currently have no case studies for this habitat type. If you know of one and would like it to feature on the site contact us.
The information set out within this advisory sheet in no way constitutes legal or regulatory advice and is based on circumstances and facts as they existed at the time Nature After Minerals compiled this document. Should there be a change in circumstances or facts, then this may adversely affect any recommendations, opinions or findings contained within this document